This also reduces the chances of artefact noise just to the band where you're taking most out. This will give you the opportunity to listen to where the most obtrusive noise is, and shape the response so that it attenuates more of that, and less where it isn't so significant. You can add points to it and drag it up and down. The other thing that sometimes helps (although I don't think it will in your example above) is to shape the amount of NR - that's what the blue line is for. Now you will find that you have a lot more lattitude to play with before strange noises get in the way. Right, if you want a quick fix then before you take your noise sample, alter the FFT setting to the highest it will go. So thanks for posting, ArialBurnz, but I'm afraid you've only just scraped the surface! Bob's method of doing multiple passes at different rates is definitely the way to do with Audition's NR, but you will always get better results in terms of remaining artefacts from higher FFT settings. The downside of course is that processing takes significantly longer. The higher FFT sizes mean that signal slices with HF in get dealt with much more accurately, hence less 'bubbly' noise. The reason for this is that you get many samples of higher frequency sound within the wider window, and the processing simply can't do anything with it. Since the FFT size essentially determines the window width, lower settings are really only much use on low frequency noise, and they are the ones responsible for most of the strange sounds you hear in the rest of the frequency range. You can get way better results from much higher settings, almost regardless of what sort of noise it is. In fact, you generally don't want to take off very much at all at FFT4096.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |